I just returned from the World Economic Forum in Davos, where the topic of runaway consumption beyond the carrying capacity of our planet was a major theme. The discussion would have profited mightily from Sterling’s excellent essay and the discussion thread here. Perhaps we can make it so next year.
I will add a little more biology to the foregoing analyses. In my own work, we have discovered that the “satisfaction” circuits so beautifully described by Sterling are actually comprised of specialized cellular pathways dedicated to the pursuit of either natural resources (e.g., food, water, etc.) or social resources (e.g., friends, partners, mates). Such “social neurons” are sensitive to the identity, qualities, social status, and value of others. We suspect that these pathways can be mutually reinforcing, as when we act collectively to achieve a useful end, or in conflict, as when we are driven to seek out others and emulate their behavior at the expense of more mundane but biologically necessary resources. Coordination of these circuits may lead to cooperation and mutual satisfaction, whereas conflict may lead to addiction to social stimulation through online and other media. Whether these separate sub-circuits are individually accessible and tunable through persuasive messaging and culture remains an open question.
is the James S. Riepe University Professor, Professor of Neuroscience, Professor of Psychology, and Professor of Marketing at the University of Pennsylvania. With appointments in the Perelman School of Medicine, the School of Arts & Sciences, and the Wharton School, he works at the intersection of economics, psychology, and neuroscience, studying the biological mechanisms that underlie decision-making in social environments.
Cite as Michael Platt, "Commentary on Why We Consume: Neural Design and Sustainability,'" Great Transition Initiative
(February 2016), http://www.greattransition.org/commentary/michael-platt-why-we-consume-peter-sterling
Back to Publication
As a forum for collectively understanding and shaping the global future, GTI welcomes diverse ideas. Thus, the opinions expressed in our publications do not necessarily reflect the views of GTI or the Tellus Institute.